Deciding which method of primary research is the best strategy for your market research question is big enough to be its own topic. In the last section, we offered recommendations for choosing whether to conduct an in-depth interview or a focus group (other primary research options include surveys and observational research). We focused on these two methodologies because they’ll get you terrific qualitative data: details about your target market’s needs, wants, and motivations; and the emotional forces behind their behaviours as consumers.
Of course, this is all essential information to have if your plan is (and it should be!) to give your prospects and customers more and more of what they want over time. And yet, you’ll only have them in the room for anywhere between 30 minutes (in the case of shorter interviews) to 2 hours (in the case of longer focus groups).
So how do you make the most of that time? Well, if you’re interviewing or facilitating the discussion yourself, here are our recommendations:
Of course, you’ll have done this when you first invited them; but you’ll put your participants at ease by ensuring that everyone (whether “everyone” is two people or twelve) is on the same page from the get-go. This means:
Once you’ve given the overview and set the ground rules, it’ll be time to dig in. If you’re hosting a focus group, you might open with an ice-breaker to get participants comfortable with each other. This “group interaction” might involve breaking up into pairs. It might involve role-playing, word association, fantasy exercises (“If you had a magic wand and could change one thing about the purchasing process, what would it be?”), or whatever will both ease your participants into conversation and be insightful for your market research. Remember: There’s no time to lose here.
Once the group has re-convened (or as you begin your one-on-one interview), move into easy, fact-based questions. These may be demographic questions. They may pertain to interests, job function, core responsibilities, challenges, goals… you know, the data that isn’t logged into your CRM. While these initial questions should be simple to answer, they should be in service of learning your target market in specific ways.
When it’s time to shift into the core discussion, participants should be warmed up… and you should have a stronger sense of your target market than you had before you walked into the room.
You might have already planned the question you’ll start with for the main discussion; or you might simply take the temperature of the room and go from there. If the conversation is flowing, and participants are engaging enthusiastically with each other, you could simply ask an open-ended question such as: “So you all know we’re here to discuss [topic X]. What are your initial thoughts on the matter?”
If that feels like throwing the door too wide open, and like it might stump participants, narrow it down a bit. Remember, you’ve asked your fact-based questions; now you’re moving into awareness, opinions, experience, and feelings. What has their experience been with a particular product? What’re their initial reactions to the television ad you just showed? (By the way, this is the time to introduce those kinds of stimuli.) What factors prompted them to leave their last service provider? As you’ll note, the questions are starting to drill down here.
As the conversation progresses, you may want to move your participants toward “conclusions” about the topic. Notice the scare quotes there: These will be tentative conclusions, borne out by your analysis after the meeting has ended. The point here is to discover if participants feel strongly enough about a topic to take a stand: “So if you were to purchase this product, it would be non-negotiable that [x]?” Discern what your participants are absolutely clear about. If you’re hosting a group, is there agreement across the board?
At the close of the interview or focus group, you’ll summarise what you’ve heard in response to your questions: key themes, insights, conclusions drawn, and so on. This is a great time to open it up and ask if participants want to reflect upon the discussion, or whether there’s more they want to say. Did you cover everything they expected you to cover? Collect feedback here.
The point is that there be a clear progression: from background, to facts, to experiences and feelings, until you’ve probed as deeply as possible into your topic and its key questions.
We’ve discussed best practices for market research survey questions elsewhere, and many of those best practices apply. The difference, however, is when you’re speaking with your target market face-to-face, you should ask only open-ended questions. Yes-or-no questions, ratings questions, and “select all that apply” questions have a place on a survey, but not in an interview or focus group: They don’t give respondents time to explore or to answer at length.
Other question types to be careful with include:
These are questions whose wording infers that there’s a “right” answer. “Would attentive users recognise that feature?” is a leading question; participants who want to be perceived as “attentive” will of course agree. When people are asked these kinds of questions, they’re likely to respond the way they think they ought to, rather than how they really feel.
Assumptive questions are exactly what they sound like: They take for granted that something is a fact, when it might not be. This either forces participants to fit their answer to your presumption, or stumps them altogether. For example, “How frustrated were you when [x] happened?” assumes your interviewee was frustrated. On the other hand, “Tell me what your feelings were when [x] happened” will yield much more insightful responses.
You may be surprised to see this question type on the list—shouldn’t your target market be able to tell you why they made a particular purchase, or why they chose to leave your business, or why they had a negative response to your newest ad campaign?
It’s useful to remember that you’re interested in the emotional states of your target market—not their rational minds. The rational mind isn’t always honest about why it does what it does: If you ask it why it bought that product, it might justify the purchase by talking about features, when the reality is that it was prompted by social status. Bob Rutter of Customer Insights Research explains it well: “Why puts people into a defensive posture, moving them away from thinking about their feelings and perceptions and being straightforward with you about that. They go right into their rational mind, and the rational mind needs to postulate an acceptable, rational, good-sounding justification for their behaviour, their thought, or their perception.”
Don’t make your respondents think they have to rationalise anything. You’re a consumer too; you know from firsthand experience that reason isn’t how purchasing decisions get made. Stick with “What were your feelings about…” questions, and you’ll get infinitely more insight out of your participants.
Steer clear of these three question types, and you’re on your way to a great interview. Of course, your questions should also be posed in a friendly and conversational tone, be clearly worded (no jargon!), and free of vague or ambiguous language. As you formulate them, pose them to family members, friends, or colleagues as a “first pass” to see what kinds of answers you get, whether you stump anyone, or whether anything in the questions is easy to misinterpret.
We’ve mentioned adopting your participants’ language—talking about your business or industry the way they talk about it—to put them at ease, and make them more likely to respond in detail and at length, as though you were an intimate. But “mirroring” extends beyond that.
For better or for worse, we humans tend to “like best” other humans with which we share the greatest number of commonalities. Studies have shown that that includes common mannerisms, which induce prosocial behaviour. In other words, if you can subtly (not creepily!) match the pace of their speech, the volume of their voice, their body orientation (leaning forward when they lean forward), the position of their arms and legs, and their general energy level, they’ll feel a greater affinity for you. And greater affinity = greater willingness to share.
If you’re practicing mirroring your participants, you’re already paying attention to these things. They go beyond what the person is saying to consider how they’re saying it. Paralanguage includes things like prosody (the speed of their speech), pitch, and volume (whether and when they’re raising their voice). Other non-verbal cues include facial expressions, gestures, eye contact, blink rate, and more.
The capacity to observe these subtle messages (collectively called “meta-communication”) takes time to develop. But it’ll help you know when participants aren’t being entirely honest; or when it’s time to probe deeper; or when a participant is triggered despite the fact that they’re “answering” your questions. Indeed, these things can sometimes tell you more about your participants than their words can.
This one may seem obvious; but it’s easy to get so caught up in the details of the moment (Is the recorder still recording? What’s that quiet person at the end of the table thinking? Shoot, I forgot her name. She looks annoyed. Is it something I said?) that you forget this is your target market, and you’re in the middle of a rare opportunity to connect with them.
So remember that you’re here because you are interested… and then show them you are. This means using their first names as much as possible. As Dale Carnegie wrote in How to Win Friends and Influence People: “Remember that a person’s name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.” It means practicing reflective listening, occasionally paraphrasing what participants say to show you want to thoroughly understand them. (Be careful, of course, of introducing bias in your paraphrasing.) It means encouraging responses through eye contact, head nodding, and so on. It means reminding them—however you can—that you’re privileged to be in conversation with them.
That said, a good interviewer or moderator will know how to strike a balance between genuine interest and over-friendliness. Becoming too friendly with participants means running the risk that they’ll tell you what they think you want to hear. (This is called “courtesy bias,” and it’s something you want to avoid.) Toe the line between comfort and formality, friendliness and professionalism.
This is one way of saying be aware of interviewer bias. One of the best pieces of advice we’ve heard is from Michael Quinn Patton of Utilisation-Focused Evaluation, who recommends that you act as though “you’ve heard it all before.” Whether you’re surprised, disturbed, or elated by a response, remain as neutral as possible. (“Neutral” means politely interested here.) Displaying emotional responses—whether through tone of voice or facial expression—might influence participants’ subsequent answers.
This also means don’t offer your own thoughts or opinions. It means don’t “correct” participants or complete their sentences for them. Each of these things can make participants feel less confident in their contributions, and more likely to shut down.
There will be times—especially if you’ve cultivated a permissive, encouraging environment and are posing the right questions—when participants say something that you want to hear more about. Here are some strategies for probing a little deeper:
You’re focused on a single topic, sure… but that doesn’t mean you can’t come at it from an assortment of angles. “Variety” could be as simple as interspersing fact-based questions throughout the interview so participants don’t experience the fatigue of too many thought-provoking questions in a row. It might mean not belabouring them with questions only about their values, but inserting a question about sensory experience in-between. Your range of questions can concern behaviours, opinions, knowledge, reflections, feelings, jogged memories (“What does it remind you of?”), or requests that they narrate an event for you.
If your interview or focus group involves a stimulus of some kind (a product demonstration, a website, marketing materials, a television ad), there’ll already be some variety in the encounter. If not, you might consider exercises to keep the conversation dynamic. Role playing, sentence completion, word association, list-making, picture-drawing, card sorting, fill-in-the-blank exercises, personifying the product, fantasy creation, futuristic imagination… the list of possibilities is long. And any of these exercises will get you insights that you wouldn’t necessarily get from an exclusively Q&A session.
As a general rule, people enjoy talking about themselves and offering their opinions; but these inclinations won’t necessarily be enough to bring them to the table. The incentives you offer will depend on your business and your budget; but they typically include things such as vouchers, discount coupons, or free products. Of course, cash is often the most compelling incentive… but if your hope is for participants to become loyal to your brand in this process, a product-based incentive will ultimately do you better.
Compensation should reflect the length of time participants give over to you. And if you’re running a focus group, we’d highly recommend refreshments and snacks—if not a full meal.
Both interviews and focus groups are best analysed immediately after they’re over—and naturally so. The conversation will be fresh in the minds of your moderator, your note-taker, and any other observers who were in the room for the experience. Your meta-analysis should include these things, all of which should go into the report of your overall findings:
… and anything else that seems worth writing down. (If you’re questioning whether it’s worthy of being recorded, it’s worthy of being recorded!) If you held more than one focus group, for instance, now would be the time to compare and contrast.
Pro Tip: When analysing responses, give more weight to answers that were specific and based on personal experience than you do to those that were vague, impersonal, or hypothetical. Personal experience should always speak most strongly.
Finally, we’d suggest the analysers take a day or two to let the whole experience sink in before reconvening to write a final report. You may have new realisations as you turn the day over in your head… and it’ll be easier to see the big ideas that may have gotten lost in the detail during the initial analysis. When you do reconvene, replay the audio or video to see what other final insights you can catch.
And then? It’s action time…
So far, we’ve discussed three important forms of primary research: market research surveys, in-depth interviews, and focus groups. In the next section, we’ll dive into one final method of primary market research: observational research. Learn what it is, what methods it entails… and why it’s worth it for your business.